This week, the full 9th Circuit refused to hear any more arguments on gay marriage.
Judge O’Scannlain’s dissent was scathing: “Based on a two-judge majority’s gross misapplication of Romer v. Evans, we have now declared that animus must have been the only conceivable motivation for a sovereign State to have remained committed to a definition of marriage that has existed for millennia,” he said.
Worse, the judge said, the decision overrules the votes of 7 million Californians based on an interpretation of Romer v. Evans that would be “unrecognizable” to those who wrote it.
Wow. It was good to hear from a judge what so many of us feel. It’s not that people disagree with us, it’s the casual disrespect with which people who support Prop 8 are treated: routinely described and treated as haters, bullies and bigots for standing up for marriage as the union of husband and wife.
Continue reading →